12/08 - Wild Wintry Weather Wednesday

LumosDC · Dec 8, 2021

Title: Remesh Conversation: Let's talk about cycling! | PANDA
Requester: Remesh Research [A2BPBC7CA5WQMW]
TurkerView: [ $16.91 / hour ]
Description: Let's talk about cycling! (~30 minute live conversation) 02:15 PM Eastern (#950c26d4)
Duration: 75 Min
Available: 1
Reward: $6.90
Qualifications:

Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 5000

HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 98

Location In US

[3QYV7EF3Q8NANG1L745ZNY49ODTKLA]

LumosDC · Dec 8, 2021

Title: Academic Survey (about 4 minutes in length) | PANDA
Requester: ugent [A3U0ZJEOCOTBKD]
TurkerView: [ $12.72 / hour ]
Description: You will be asked to respond to some questions and/or express your preferences.
Duration: 30 Min
Available: 40
Reward: $0.40
Qualifications:

Total approved HITs GreaterThan 1000

HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 98

Location EqualTo US

[33LV6TSG6939XR9EUY17FCHDBMSQVN]

AMindAtTurk · Dec 8, 2021

LumosDC said: ↑

Title: Remesh Conversation: Let's talk about cycling! | PANDA
Requester: Remesh Research [A2BPBC7CA5WQMW]
TurkerView: [ $16.91 / hour ]
Description: Let's talk about cycling! (~30 minute live conversation) 02:15 PM Eastern (#950c26d4)
Duration: 75 Min
Available: 1
Reward: $6.90
Qualifications:

Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 5000

HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 98

Location In US

[3QYV7EF3Q8NANG1L745ZNY49ODTKLA]
Click to expand...

Misread that as Let's talk about dying and was super confused for a second

laby · Dec 8, 2021

NYU Neurolinguistics Lab [A2ANKNPEKA2753] Guess the next word in a sentence - $2.00 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Fair[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $16.00 / hour
00:07:30 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: a second ago)
Qualifications: Masters Exists ; Location EqualTo US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read NYU Neurolinguistics Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301281" data-reviewerId="39" |[/div]

ChrisTurk · Dec 8, 2021

lanaaa said: ↑

Distinguished
Click to expand...

lololololololol

Random Turker · Dec 8, 2021

JIAYUAN ZHANG [A2RH51WX8QAQ4Y] Answer a survey about your online retailer preferences - $2.00 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Good[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $10.34 / hour
00:11:36 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Very Low (HIT Last Seen: 83 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 100; HIT approval rate (%) > 90;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read JIAYUAN ZHANG's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301282" data-reviewerId="5700" |[/div]

QueenBeeatrix · Dec 8, 2021

lanaaa said: ↑

I was just sent this email regarding the Frankline Muthomi rejections:

Dear MTurk Worker:

Thank you for your email objecting to the rejection of your HIT for our budget balancing simulation. Valid responses for the research require that we are able to match the answers to the Qualtrics survey with the decisions made in the budget balancing simulation. Any other response is unusable. We have carefully reviewed the dataset as captured in the Qualtrics survey, Balancing Act simulation, and MTurk batch results, and we are very pleased that over 790 MTurk workers have been able to complete the two-part HIT successfully.

Our approval threshold was set that the MTurk submission code must match the code at the end of Qualtrics survey, and the unique code generated in the Qualtrics survey must match the unique code submitted in the budget simulation. Some workers were rejected because it was impossible to connect their survey responses to a completed budget simulation. Entries were rejected when one or more of the codes were either erroneous or missing from the table provided by MTurk that shows worker ID, the simulation code entered, and the end code entered.

We carefully review each submission to insure that the worker has completed the simulation and properly entered the provided code, and then properly completed the survey and entered the proper code.

Some workers have complained that we unfairly rejected their work. Sadly, over 60 MTurk workers skipped the simulation entirely. Others have sent screen shots of the budget simulation, as if this is evidence of complete work. We are unable to substantiate screen shots because they are not tied to a simulation submission. If the person does not push SUBMIT, the answers are not recorded in the simulation database. Anyone can enter a code in the simulation box after the project has been closed and take a screen shot, but if the code is not one issued by the Qualtrics program and recorded by MTurk, it is not evidence of an authentic entry. We can see exactly when someone pushes submit on any one of the 8 different treatments in the simulation data set.

Some workers have charged that our project was faulty. We have thoroughly analyzed the results provided by MTurk to identify a fault. Each of the 8 treatment groups has about the same number of responses across over 790 correct responses, so there was no error with the random assignment of workers to different treatments. The distribution of correct and incorrect submissions does not vary over time, based on MTurk data. Simulations that were completed with a submission were recorded in the data base from Qualtrics and if the code at the end of the survey were correct, we paid the worker appropriately.

When a few workers complained about rejections before the time for review deadline, I directed Mr. Muthomi to give them an opportunity to complete the simulation and survey using their MTurk worker ID in place of the codes. Several people successfully did so and their surveys were acceptable.

The MTurk data suggest that the bulk of the errors are for incorrect end code entries. For example, some workers indicated they clicked the back button to reread directions, and then when they clicked forward, they received a different code. They entered the new code but Qualtrics may have recorded the previous code. Qualtrics does not provide any way for us to test that possibility or correct that error.

We have a keen interest in getting the minimum number of completed entries to successfully proceed with our research. We understand that MTurk workers do not want a rejection on their record.

You have politely requested a chance to remediate the MTurk rejection and you shared your MTurk worker ID for our HIT. Therefore, we are offering you the following remediation to achieve our mutual goals.

They go on to list the process to complete the study again and submit with your worker ID used in the email.

If you agree to this remediation, please use this link to begin the remediation. We look forward to notifying you of a successful completion.

If you reject this remediation invitation, please reply to that effect and we will notify the NIU IRB office accordingly.

Thank you for considering this opportunity to remediate this research project exercise and achieve our mutual goals.

Peace,

Kurt Thurmaier

Distinguished Engagement Professor and Chair

Department of Public Administration

Northern Illinois University

Yeah, they need to meet their quota so they've changed their tone. I honestly don't know how I feel about taking them up on the offer. I would like to be rid of those rejections BUT I also want to stick it them for their treatment of this whole thing. Also, I find it hard to trust them.
Edit: I know everyone probably got the same email but I'm posting this here just in case some people never received a reply from them since they seem to be bad at that.
Click to expand...

Aren't these the guys who were rude to a bunch of people for even saying anything about their rejections?

Michelle Smith · Dec 8, 2021

AMindAtTurk said: ↑

Click to expand...

LumosDC · Dec 8, 2021

AMindAtTurk said: ↑

Misread that as Let's talk about dying and was super confused for a second

Click to expand...

I'm sure there be a Remesh about something relating to dying one of these days. All I could thing about when I read your post was the news from a few days ago about assisted suicide death capsules receiving legal approval in Switzerland and how the market research on the design of it is done.

https://gizmodo.com/controversial-assisted-suicide-pod-cleared-for-use-in-s-1848167349

PinkLady · Dec 8, 2021

RBC Behavioral Research Lab [A3PZOHOTANLBYJ] Beauty Study(~ 5 minutes) - $0.50 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $8.18 / hour
00:03:40 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: a second ago)
Qualifications: TP Panel: -1655170301 N >= 100; Total approved HITs >= 500; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98; Exc: [10528786-335335] DoesNotExist ; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read RBC Behavioral Research Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301298" data-reviewerId="44442" |[/div]

mdeem · Dec 8, 2021

Antino Kim [A2U6YZEK262E09] Yelp and Restaurant Search Results - $3.00 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Fair[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $21.22 / hour
00:08:29 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
select the same bubble options for almost 10 minutes[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 17 minutes ago)
Qualifications: YelpLabel DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) > 98; Total approved HITs > 5000; Location EqualTo US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read Antino Kim's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301304" data-reviewerId="27264" |[/div]

Imanuel · Dec 8, 2021

lanaaa said: ↑

I was just sent this email regarding the Frankline Muthomi rejections:

Dear MTurk Worker:

Thank you for your email objecting to the rejection of your HIT for our budget balancing simulation. Valid responses for the research require that we are able to match the answers to the Qualtrics survey with the decisions made in the budget balancing simulation. Any other response is unusable. We have carefully reviewed the dataset as captured in the Qualtrics survey, Balancing Act simulation, and MTurk batch results, and we are very pleased that over 790 MTurk workers have been able to complete the two-part HIT successfully.

Our approval threshold was set that the MTurk submission code must match the code at the end of Qualtrics survey, and the unique code generated in the Qualtrics survey must match the unique code submitted in the budget simulation. Some workers were rejected because it was impossible to connect their survey responses to a completed budget simulation. Entries were rejected when one or more of the codes were either erroneous or missing from the table provided by MTurk that shows worker ID, the simulation code entered, and the end code entered.

We carefully review each submission to insure that the worker has completed the simulation and properly entered the provided code, and then properly completed the survey and entered the proper code.

Some workers have complained that we unfairly rejected their work. Sadly, over 60 MTurk workers skipped the simulation entirely. Others have sent screen shots of the budget simulation, as if this is evidence of complete work. We are unable to substantiate screen shots because they are not tied to a simulation submission. If the person does not push SUBMIT, the answers are not recorded in the simulation database. Anyone can enter a code in the simulation box after the project has been closed and take a screen shot, but if the code is not one issued by the Qualtrics program and recorded by MTurk, it is not evidence of an authentic entry. We can see exactly when someone pushes submit on any one of the 8 different treatments in the simulation data set.

Some workers have charged that our project was faulty. We have thoroughly analyzed the results provided by MTurk to identify a fault. Each of the 8 treatment groups has about the same number of responses across over 790 correct responses, so there was no error with the random assignment of workers to different treatments. The distribution of correct and incorrect submissions does not vary over time, based on MTurk data. Simulations that were completed with a submission were recorded in the data base from Qualtrics and if the code at the end of the survey were correct, we paid the worker appropriately.

When a few workers complained about rejections before the time for review deadline, I directed Mr. Muthomi to give them an opportunity to complete the simulation and survey using their MTurk worker ID in place of the codes. Several people successfully did so and their surveys were acceptable.

The MTurk data suggest that the bulk of the errors are for incorrect end code entries. For example, some workers indicated they clicked the back button to reread directions, and then when they clicked forward, they received a different code. They entered the new code but Qualtrics may have recorded the previous code. Qualtrics does not provide any way for us to test that possibility or correct that error.

We have a keen interest in getting the minimum number of completed entries to successfully proceed with our research. We understand that MTurk workers do not want a rejection on their record.

You have politely requested a chance to remediate the MTurk rejection and you shared your MTurk worker ID for our HIT. Therefore, we are offering you the following remediation to achieve our mutual goals.

They go on to list the process to complete the study again and submit with your worker ID used in the email.

If you agree to this remediation, please use this link to begin the remediation. We look forward to notifying you of a successful completion.

If you reject this remediation invitation, please reply to that effect and we will notify the NIU IRB office accordingly.

Thank you for considering this opportunity to remediate this research project exercise and achieve our mutual goals.

Peace,

Kurt Thurmaier

Distinguished Engagement Professor and Chair

Department of Public Administration

Northern Illinois University

Yeah, they need to meet their quota so they've changed their tone. I honestly don't know how I feel about taking them up on the offer. I would like to be rid of those rejections BUT I also want to stick it them for their treatment of this whole thing. Also, I find it hard to trust them.
Edit: I know everyone probably got the same email but I'm posting this here just in case some people never received a reply from them since they seem to be bad at that.
Click to expand...

Oh what a load of S*** that email is.

I love how he tries to brag that 790 people did it right. But if you look at thier requester page it says they, rather conveniently, have a 79% acceptance rate. This implies, to me, that they have a quota of 1000 responses that they were trying to fill and that they rejected probably around 150 people if you count the bs they pulled with that second hit. They also had a 95% qualification on their task. I don't know how that idiot can sit there and act all high and mighty like hes not the one in the wrong rejecting so many people. If you have a HIT with an acceptance rate qual and your data doesn't line up with the acceptance rate, it doesn't take a genius to figure out who probably messed something up.

LordSteele · Dec 8, 2021

PickFu [AI2HRFAYYSAW7] Rank 6 options, 1 written response - $0.26 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $22.29 / hour
00:00:42 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: one minute ago)
Qualifications: PickFu NDA EqualTo 1; TWL >= 10; Location EqualTo US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read PickFu's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301305" data-reviewerId="1039" |[/div]

AMindAtTurk · Dec 8, 2021

Ask Crowd [A2J1NCRXSHFBCP] Scientific experiment on group decisions(~ 10 minutes) - $2.50 $1.00 bonus | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Generous[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $23.95 / hour
00:08:46 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
Completion time will vary based on your wait time[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 6 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; Exc: [-83175559-335342] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read Ask Crowd's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301306" data-reviewerId="147" |[/div]

mdeem · Dec 8, 2021

Tanay Modi [A2URPX43ZTOWF] Answer an Academic Survey (~ 2 minutes) - $0.35 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Good[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $26.81 / hour
00:00:47 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: a second ago)
Qualifications: Exc: [335471-335347] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs >= 50; HIT approval rate (%) >= 90; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read Tanay Modi's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301310" data-reviewerId="27264" |[/div]

PinkLady · Dec 8, 2021

Emily Van Duyn [A1XMI1OVYNY7NU] COMPLETE A SURVEY ABOUT COMMUNICATION AND POLITICS(~ 20 minutes) - $1.00 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $5.67 / hour
00:10:35 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
No code at the end[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 5 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 500; Exc: [10374862-333528] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US; TP Panel: -1393591098 N >= 100;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read Emily Van Duyn's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301315" data-reviewerId="44442" |[/div]

mdeem · Dec 8, 2021

Jonathan Homola [AFOZMHXGTP4E6] Quick survey about other people, 5mins - $2.00 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Generous[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $52.94 / hour
00:02:16 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
quick easy ratings[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: one minute ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 100; HIT approval rate (%) > 95; Location EqualTo US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read Jonathan Homola's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301316" data-reviewerId="27264" |[/div]

somniax0x · Dec 8, 2021

Stormation [A3RN8CGUNSQIPM] Write a social media comment (~1 min) #8443 - $0.12 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $9.19 / hour
00:00:47 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 28 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Location In AU, CA, GB, IE, NZ, US; Total approved HITs >= 1000; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read Stormation's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301317" data-reviewerId="39586" |[/div]

somniax0x · Dec 8, 2021

Stormation [A3RN8CGUNSQIPM] Write a social media comment (~1 min) #3342 - $0.12 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $5.68 / hour
00:01:16 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 65 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Location In AU, CA, GB, IE, NZ, US; Total approved HITs >= 1000; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read Stormation's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301318" data-reviewerId="39586" |[/div]

somniax0x · Dec 8, 2021

Mary Smith [A1LU4GKEQWRVVC] Scenario study about work(~ 15 minutes) - $2.50 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $15.33 / hour
00:09:47 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]

Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: one minute ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; TP Panel: -289194157 N >= 100; Exc: [-1126969328-333820] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98; CR Research Group #1 >= 100; Location In US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |
To read Mary Smith's full profile check out TurkerView!
[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="1301319" data-reviewerId="39586" |[/div]

12/08 - Wild Wintry Weather Wednesday

LumosDC Survey Slinger

LumosDC Survey Slinger

AMindAtTurk Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

laby Survey Slinger Former MTG MotM TurkerView Masters

ChrisTurk Survey Slinger

Random Turker Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

QueenBeeatrix Active Turker

Michelle Smith Survey Slinger

LumosDC Survey Slinger

PinkLady Survey Slinger

mdeem Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

Imanuel Well-Known Turker

LordSteele Survey Slinger

AMindAtTurk Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

mdeem Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

PinkLady Survey Slinger

mdeem Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

somniax0x Turker

somniax0x Turker

somniax0x Turker

About TurkerView Forum

12/08 - Wild Wintry Weather Wednesday

LumosDC Survey Slinger

LumosDC Survey Slinger

AMindAtTurk Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

laby Survey Slinger Former MTG MotM TurkerView Masters

ChrisTurk Survey Slinger

Random Turker Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

QueenBeeatrix Active Turker

Michelle Smith Survey Slinger

LumosDC Survey Slinger

PinkLady Survey Slinger

mdeem Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

Imanuel Well-Known Turker

LordSteele Survey Slinger

AMindAtTurk Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

mdeem Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

PinkLady Survey Slinger

mdeem Survey Slinger TurkerView Masters

somniax0x Turker

somniax0x Turker

somniax0x Turker

Useful Searches