09/19 - Wait Up Wednesday!

Just here to prove CT will heart it even if she's being threatening.

 

Just a heads up this seems kinda broken right now (along w/ points.. points are super fucked up).. I think its mostly calculating the comparisons correctly but it def seems like edits are not updating some aggregate data correctly.

 

Ask @CorvusSapiens I think she's way hotter in these situations

 

I'm not kink shaming you but you may want to talk to someone about this.

 

Are you implying that AlphaOC might not actually be a perfectly balanced worker?



https://turkerview.com/users/?user=564

 

Title: 091918 Choose the Best Photo Adjustment [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Research Squads [A3PB00G54127G0]
TurkerView: [ $38.34 / hour ]
Description: Review a series of images, grouped into sets of two. Each image in a pair represents a slight variation from the other. Your goal is to simply select the one that is most appealing to you aesthetically, based on the exposure, color, etc.
Duration: 06:00:00
Available: 0
Reward: $2.50
Qualifications:

• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 85,
• Photo Adjustment testers DoesNotExist [ Request | How to Use ]
• Location EqualTo US,

[37NNZ8MO7SGDM5BANZT4CQR1N32EQW]​

 

Title: Impulsivity Survey [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Kailey Liverman [A2WTNZNOB8TD7F]
TurkerView: [ $8.45 / hour ]
Description: Assessments of impulsivity and other related bahaviors
Duration: 00:00:00
Available: 0
Reward: $0.50
Qualifications:

[3BH1IVA3WLGTUNHDK4BTN2ESEHSR19]​

 

Can confirm: @ChrisTurk likes it rough.

Wait...I didn't mean to say that.

 

Yup, 24% slower that average.... I've been hovering at that for my short tenure here, mostly due to a couple survey links that I had opened up but was unable to get to right away (I think).

 

Please take a break if you would like. There are 2 more blocks of images for you to rate.

I think this is gonna be shorter than 90 minutes but still mindnumbingly horrible.

 

Jihyeon Kim [A1FXT53UNVJO95] Answer a survey about your opinions - $1.00 | PANDA

[3TYSWKZBELVPGTTCMFLRPSI59T57GF]​

[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $9.92 / hour
00:06:03 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

​

Pros:

Cons:
A whole bunch of short answer writing.

To read Jihyeon Kim's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="101917" data-reviewerId="48" |[/div]

 

Some weebs are into yandere so I think that is a lot more tame tbh

 

Are you reporting surveys with inaccurate times then? The review should be the actual time spent so just refresh the mturk page to reset the timer before you actually start. If you get distracted for whatever reason and can't accurately subtract that time just don't post a review for that hit.

 

I read this as...

 

No, I adjusted the times for those pertinent reviews. Is that ok?

 

Yeah that is fine and what most of us do. I was just making sure because some people seem to have a hard time grasping the concept.

 

josh.wiener@okstate.edu [A2ZTECTX04M1LY] Descriptive Study - $0.50 | PANDA

[3EOZAW7619K1M8KUW5MZ2DRDHCE8HT]​

[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Good[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $10.47 / hour
00:02:52 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read josh.wiener@okstate.edu's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="101919" data-reviewerId="3221" |[/div]

 

Larry Rudman [A1MW3S07ZHO2EM] Analyzing Arguments - $7.50 | PANDA

[3OLDKDGFCLVTVL86RSOH7CBKQGKODT]​

[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Generous[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $18.72 / hour
00:24:02 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Larry Rudman's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="101920" data-reviewerId="1980" |[/div]