03/04 - Watery Wednesday!

Matthew Crayne [A2TBCY8FEL5NM0] Answer a survey about your leadership style(~ 30 minutes) - $1.50 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $3.88 / hour
00:23:13 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

Rejected!
Requester Feedback: Hello - your submission has been rejected for payment due to evidence in the data that responses were careless or generated by non-human sources In particular the text-based responses to the questions in the study were either copied directly from the case prompt copied from elsewhere in the study or indicated that they were taken from another source and inserted into the response box Such responses indicate that the participant was not following instructions and data cannot be trusted or used​

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]


Catchability: Impossible (HIT Last Seen: 46 hours ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs <= 10000; Total approved HITs >= 500; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location In US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |

To read Matthew Crayne's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="678792" data-reviewerId="13095" |[/div]

 

Rachel Harmon [A3MKOAQTUOP7D3] Answer a survey about your political opinions - $1.50 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Generous[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $25.71 / hour
00:03:30 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

​

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
can't do if you did this on 2/12 but there's no disqual[/div]
[/div]


Catchability: Expiring Now (HIT Last Seen: 27 hours ago)
Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |

To read Rachel Harmon's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="678793" data-reviewerId="3236" |[/div]

 

Using punctuation is so 2019.

 

The 20k number isn't new. It has been that way for like 4 or 5 years now.

 

Randomacts be like

 

Sage Team [A2UOGSB9JNQK7S] Predicting Economic, Political, and Scientific Events - $6.00 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Generous[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $35.88 / hour
00:10:02 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

​

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
1 of 3 weekly forecasting HITs. Possible $20 bonus to top forecasters.[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
Watch instruction video. Must enter a comment to submit.[/div]
[/div]


Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 29 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 5000; PM Register EqualTo 2; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98; Location EqualTo US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |

To read Sage Team's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="678822" data-reviewerId="2500" |[/div]

 

David Hagmann [A2OZJB9LYMCMUC] Study on Decision Making (2 questions)(~ 1 minutes) - $0.10 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Generous[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $18.95 / hour
00:00:19 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

​

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]


Catchability: Great (HIT Last Seen: 51 seconds ago)
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) >= 99; Exc: [19-201672] DoesNotExist ; Location In US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |

To read David Hagmann's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="678823" data-reviewerId="3236" |[/div]

 

Title: Participate in a ~25 minute study about your impressions of the people writing texts(~ 25 minutes) | PANDA
Requester: Igor Grossmann [A35XVPV3OC3EVK]
TurkerView: [ $21.25 / hour ]
Description: Read short texts and describe your impressions of the people who wrote them. Answer short surveys. $3.00 for ~ 25 minutes
Duration: 90 Min
Available: 0
Reward: $3.00
Qualifications:

• Exc: [222762792-201676] DoesNotExist
• Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 50,
• Location In CA, US,
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90,

[348F9UQ1NKLFFD017QZ0V5RQHZUI2L]​

 

More like google gives outdated af mturk tax info.

 

Title: Responses to Media Messages(~ 15 minutes) | PANDA
Requester: Jessica Gall Myrick [A2QBWYYBB6RSWI]
TurkerView: [ $3.61 / hour ]
Description: Take a survey to gauge your responses to common media messages and personalities
Duration: 45 Min
Available: 56
Reward: $0.76
Qualifications:

• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95,
• Location In US,

[3JCELWMC3OWVOSBQ0IFETWLBY2U3VP]​

 

I'm not up on all these modern abbreviations. Ass-uming "af" = "and faux"?

 

as... fornication.

 

What? Has this been 'outdated' now?

 

I'll go there, "Outdated as fuck"

Like, "You're stupid as fuck."

af is just a nicer way to say it so the word fuck doesn't have to be used.
Or a faster way to say the word fuck.

 

Eleanor Putnam-Farr [A2U3KNMZLH8FJ9] Product preference survey(~ 4 minutes) - $0.40 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Generous[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
<24 hours[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $24.00 / hour
00:01:00 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

Approved! ​

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]


Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 4 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 100; HIT approval rate (%) >= 95; Location In US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |

To read Eleanor Putnam-Farr's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="678851" data-reviewerId="9663" |[/div]

 

Sage Team [A2UOGSB9JNQK7S] Predicting Economic, Political, and Scientific Events - $6.00 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Generous[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $24.43 / hour
00:14:44 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

​

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
[/div]
[/div]


Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 47 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 5000; PM Register EqualTo 1; HIT approval rate (%) >= 98; Location EqualTo US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |

To read Sage Team's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="678852" data-reviewerId="9663" |[/div]

 

Piet van de Mosselaar [A9FTBBWKGZEWB] $2/15 min.: watch slideshows with affective pictures. (This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) - $2.00 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Low[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $9.11 / hour
00:13:10 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

​

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
Extremely graphic images.[/div]
[/div]


Catchability: Okay (HIT Last Seen: 5 minutes ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs > 1000; previous DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) > 98; Location EqualTo US; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |

To read Piet van de Mosselaar's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="678854" data-reviewerId="9663" |[/div]

 

Research Lab [AFHV1ISCCWY5R] Workplace Scenario(~ 4 minutes) - $0.40 | PANDA
[div] style="border: 1px solid transparent; padding: 10px 0; display: flex; align-items: center; border-color: #ecf0f1; box-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); text-align: center;" |
[div] style="float: left; width: 25%;" |
Underpaid[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 41%;" |[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
<24 hours[/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 50%;" |
Unrated[/div][/div]
[div] style="float: left; width: 33%;" | $4.24 / hour
00:05:40 / completion time[/div]
[/div]

Approved! ​

[div] style="width: 100%; display: flex; flex-items: center; margin-top: 5px;" |[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 5px 0 0;" | Pros:
[/div]
[div] style="width: 50%; display: inline-block; margin: 0 0 0 5px;" | Cons:
I should of listen to the many reviews that were listed on the review and return, this HIT was simplistic in its nature but emphasized the high probability of receiving a rejection. has multiple bot checks and 'supposedly' attention checks within the survey, i don't remember any but could be wrong. beware.[/div]
[/div]


Catchability: Impossible (HIT Last Seen: 3 hours ago)
Qualifications: Total approved HITs >= 500; Exc: [-1183476365-201582] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) >= 99; Location In US;
[div] style="margin-top: 5px;" |

To read Research Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

[/div]
[div] style="display: none;" data-type="tv-review" data-revId="678855" data-reviewerId="16632" |[/div]

 

Also, this you're wasn't directed at you, lol! when I read it back it sound like I was calling you stupid, and I wasn't! My bad!!