09/04 - A Thousand Miles Tuesday!

>.>

I have a purse big enough to store an infant in there, plus all my stuff.

It's also floral.

I'm secretly an old lady on the inside.

 

Title: Estimation survey(~ 5 minutes) [ $ | $ ] PANDA
Requester: Julia Minson [A35QRRKSLEDRZA]
TurkerView: [ $15.18 / hour ]
Description: Short (5 minute) survey.
Duration: 00:30:00
Available: 4
Reward: $0.50
Qualifications:

• Exc: [1194979197-104982] DoesNotExist [ Request | How to Use ]
• Location In US,

[3T9YKFMCHYGCDCJLEFLIB9MKK1S9C6]​

 

but would always have hard candy and gum in it

 

TY for the opions about the purse!! I like that 1 a lot. good to know it's not a mom purse

 

Research Study [A2N3H3G34WHGKV] Answer a very short survey about your purchase decisions. - $1.00 | PANDA

[33CCZ2QQ0M8VDPFJBWPFUBMFYOP9E6]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$25.17 / hour
00:02:23 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Research Study's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

>.>



Listen, I love those watermelon hard candies with the chewy center. WHO DOESN'T?! AND WHO DOESN'T LOVE BUTTERSCOTCH AND PEPPERMINT? MAYBE A LIFE SAVER OR TWO? STOP JUDGING MEEE!

 

RIP, just realized that even though I did last weeks Survey Comet I forgot to submit it. At least it's letting me do this weeks still.

 

Karen [A3II2SWG421YGS] Answer a survey about your opinions - $2.00 | PANDA

[30MQSQ7C9T6TXWLFKO56LRHNMTIBT8]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$62.07 / hour
00:01:56 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
Has like an 8 minute timer or something

To read Karen's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Chill Lab [A8A3YA5X53R2K] Tell us about the technology you don't like! - $1.00 | PANDA

[36E5WSNG7J2EIYL8MQ1HGEW1Y2F4S5]​

Good

Unrated

Unrated

$10.20 / hour
00:05:53 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Chill Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

David Ross [ALI74PJG6I057] Face Recognition Study 2(~ 30 minutes) - $2.00 | PANDA

[3RO2E92D0W2IOBI0C9Y9OBEL20H4DS]​

Generous

Unrated

Unrated

$15.79 / hour
00:07:36 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:
Repetitive
A little writing

To read David Ross's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

I guess Rowan de-qualed some people.

 

You've received a bonus from Rowan Zellers for work related to 3KTCJ4SCVG8AHMTOUDKJW1JZ39G1MF.
The value of your bonus is: $1.00 USD

The Requester included this note:

Hi there! Individual feedback: Your HITs look great, keep up the awesome work!
General feedback (that I'm sending to all workers): These HITs were pretty good! However, it seems like my task has exploded in popularity, so I unfortunately had to dequal some workers (not you if you're getting this message) who didn't seem to be doing the task correctly. Check out the hall of fame at rowanzellers.com/halloffame if you want more examples of what I'm looking for. More specificially:
1) Try to avoid templated or generic questions. I noticed many workers asked 'What are .... looking at?' This often isn't the best question as 'looking' describes a static situation. A better question might be 'Why are ... looking at X?' or 'What happened with X?' (describing other, often more interesting aspects of the scene rather than people looking at something).
2) I noticed a few answers involved made up stories, rather than reasonable/likely inferences about the scene. (By 'stories' I mean making up a detailed backstory about the characters, etc. rather than going off what the image is talking about). Additionally, please make sure all your 3 questions/answers/rationales stand on their own, rather than e.g. one question depending on context from a previous answer.
3) I noticed some responses had confusion about the rationales. Just as a reminder, what I want is a detail that you observe in the image, and/or a piece of world knowledge, that justifies the answer. I'm less interested in elaborations on the answer or restating information from the question.
4) Again, try to avoid repeating the same templated or generic questions. A lot of questions like 'How does X feel?' could be improved with some more specificity: like 'How does X feel about Y?'
Anyways, more HITs to be uploaded shortly. Thanks! -Rowan

 

You've received a bonus from Rowan Zellers for work related to 39TX062QX1VHL167VO0BVBEU8XB3XQ.
The value of your bonus is: $0.05 USD

The Requester included this note:

Hi there! Individual feedback: Thanks for trying my HITs! They look good so far, though I didn’t have time to take a very thorough look as you didn’t submit many during this batch.
General feedback (that I'm sending to all workers): These HITs were pretty good! However, it seems like my task has exploded in popularity, so I unfortunately had to dequal some workers (not you if you're getting this message) who didn't seem to be doing the task correctly. Check out the hall of fame at rowanzellers.com/halloffame if you want more examples of what I'm looking for. More specificially:
1) Try to avoid templated or generic questions. I noticed many workers asked 'What are .... looking at?' This often isn't the best question as 'looking' describes a static situation. A better question might be 'Why are ... looking at X?' or 'What happened with X?' (describing other, often more interesting aspects of the scene rather than people looking at something).
2) I noticed a few answers involved made up stories, rather than reasonable/likely inferences about the scene. (By 'stories' I mean making up a detailed backstory about the characters, etc. rather than going off what the image is talking about). Additionally, please make sure all your 3 questions/answers/rationales stand on their own, rather than e.g. one question depending on context from a previous answer.
3) I noticed some responses had confusion about the rationales. Just as a reminder, what I want is a detail that you observe in the image, and/or a piece of world knowledge, that justifies the answer. I'm less interested in elaborations on the answer or restating information from the question.
4) Again, try to avoid repeating the same templated or generic questions. A lot of questions like 'How does X feel?' could be improved with some more specificity: like 'How does X feel about Y?'
Anyways, more HITs to be uploaded shortly. Thanks! -Rowan

Thanks for being a Worker on Mechanical Turk!

 

Robert Meyer [A2IDUJDYPJGEX5] survey about shopping - $0.30 | PANDA

[3X92HJBC3Y2S7456BNPQCRQQBGSW8V]​

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$6.35 / hour
00:02:50 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Robert Meyer's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Online Panel [AFH23TCHBL8WG] <2 minute survey about preferencecs - $0.20 | PANDA

[3P6UG6V268U8CHF13NQEJ9VZYZON49]​

Fair

Unrated

Unrated

$7.27 / hour
00:01:39 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Online Panel's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Chill Lab [A8A3YA5X53R2K] Tell us about your favorite technology! - $1.00 | PANDA

[3O3GBVZQLOJKUXYP7HDT20HRZL72UQ]​

Unrated

Unrated

Unrated

$5.49 / hour
00:10:56 / completion time

​

Pros:

Cons:

To read Chill Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​

 

Title: Give your opinion on a story | PANDA
Requester: anne hamby [A3B5HXC347ML6D]
TurkerView: [ $11.64 / hour ]
Description: You will offer your opinions about different consumer scenarios
Duration: 01:00:00
Available: 53
Reward: $1.00
Qualifications:

• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95
• Location EqualTo US

[3SYNYPC5I7DNJF0CC14YX6DLZ12YHW]​

 

@rowan just a tag to remind you that you da real MVP.

 

STS Lab [A3UBQTCR2B8RJN] Name animals and objects: 10 minutes or less - $1.50 | PANDA

[3OUUO7TL3Y0ZL5OX12R6RKRGFF0EHD]​

Generous

Unrated

Excellent

$14.79 / hour
00:06:05 / completion time

​

Pros:
So, I originally had the auto submit issue mentioned in the first page of the HIT. So do this in Incognito mode on Chrome if you think you may have issues. However, after it auto submitted they approved and gave me the option to do a make up HIT if I contacted them.

I contacted them and they quickly set up a make up HIT. Worked in Incognito mode just fine. It's an issue with the enter key auto submitting.

I did the make up HIT but I just went ahead and put my info on this HIT instead for prosperity and communication reasons.

Oh P.S - There is an opportunity for more work if you do well on this. Say's a 5 dollar HIT coming but we shall see.
Cons:

To read STS Lab's full profile check out TurkerView!​